AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Mediawiki vs dokuwiki4/6/2023 Domain names & emails are not case insensitive, so it's the same for Tiki wiki pages. In MediaWiki, pages are case sensitive so is different than which can make sense on Wikipedia, but for most other wikis, it's more user-friendly that and show the same content.From the MediaWiki roadmap and the Tiki roadmap, you see the main focus is to power a top-10 site in the World vs adding more features.MediaWiki is highly optimized for performance and distributing content on hundreds of servers (which is needed for Wikipedia).In MediaWiki, some of your plugins/extensions may have become abandoned or be incompatible with the new version. When Tiki is upgraded, all the features are supported and the upgrade is smooth.In contrast, if you maintain dozens of MediaWiki sites, they will have different modules installed depending the use case. This makes it easier for a hosting company and for upgrades. Tiki has all the features built-in (and you just activate/deactivate features), thus, every Tiki instance of a given version has the same code base.Whereas in Tiki, there is only one and thus, the name is descriptive. In MediaWiki, there can be more than one "extension" for the same feature so they have different names. ![]() Tiki is the all-in-one model while MediaWiki (like Joomla!) is the small-core-and-add-what-you-need model. The MediaWiki community of course Dogfoods MediaWiki to organize but also needs several other tools such as Bugzilla, vBulletin, etc.MediaWiki doesn't offer forums, bug tracker, blogs, etc Because of these design choices, Tiki has more features out-of-the-box. MediaWiki is focused on being a great Wiki for projects such as Wikipedia, whereas Tiki is more of an out-of-the box Content Management System / general purpose wiki with all the features built-in.While people often compare them, Tiki is also comparable to Drupal and Joomla! as it's a full-featured CMS which happens to be Wiki-centric.Top-2 wiki engines with the most consultants.Both are written in PHP and can be used with MySQL.Please see (if) Why Wiki Syntax Is Important to your project. Both can run on standard, inexpensive hosting.Both are free and open source web applications with a powerful wiki.If you are already using MediaWiki and you are thinking of moving to Tiki, you can use the MediaWiki importer Video interview from OSCON 2011 Since it's so well-known, you will likely need arguments to explain this. Similar to " Nobody ever got fired for picking IBM ", often, people will not go through a proper analysis and consider other wiki engines such as DokuWiki, TWiki, XWiki_old, MoinMoin, etc. Many people pick MediaWiki just because so many others do. However, since MediaWiki is primarily developed to run Wikipedia (and your project is not Wikipedia!), it may very well be that MediaWiki is not your best choice. ![]() ![]() As such, it enjoys a massive virtuous circle. MediaWiki is the most deployed wiki engine. Nobody ever got fired for picking MediaWiki Since MediaWiki is so well-known, a frequent question is: What is the difference between MediaWiki and Tiki? It is now used by several other projects of the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation and by many other wikis. MediaWiki is a free software wiki package originally written for Wikipedia.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |